26 January 2016

New Zealand’s National Day – Waitangi Day


Waitangi Treaty grounds.


Note: I am not going to list everything that happened in New Zealand in regards to Waitangi Day. This is just the basics to what was happening when the day became a national day.


Waitangi Day is New Zealand’s national day, which is different from many national days for example when historical figures arrive in a country and raise a flag.  The national day represents the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi between Maori and the British government in 1840 at Waitangi in the Bay of Islands. The Maori at the time thought they were getting a fair deal that lead to many issues years later including the New Zealand Wars. The treaty was written in two parts, in two languages and the Maori version was written overnight by Missionaries. The issues between the two parts of the treaty revolve around the two different meanings. The Waitangi Treaty was not the only treaty that had been signed by the Maori as there had been a Declaration of Independence in 1835 by the Northern Chiefs who wanted British rule instead of other countries like France. The national day has been a cause for tension and protest for Maori since it began.

New Zealand’s national day was lobbied for in 1960 to make the 6th of February with the view to make it a day of thanksgiving and commemoration. It was not until 1974 the public holiday became known as New Zealand Day and by 1976 the day had been changed to Waitangi Day. The government hoped the anniversary would become distinctive to New Zealand instead of being something about war like ANZAC Day. There are many varied views about Waitangi Day and they range from people thinking the treaty signing made the people of New Zealand one or others hold the view that the Pakeha (White person) have ignored the articles within the treaty. The common belief is the Maori did not understand what they were signing and the ramifications from the treaty. The Maori view the treaty as a living thing especially as the Maori version has the most signatures in other words the treaty has mana. The Maori translation actually has the biggest status in international law as the Maori view the document as a binding contract.

The treaty itself has been the cause for tensions throughout long after it had been signed. The Maori had the impression they would keep possession of their land and would be undisputed under the terms. They also believed the treaty would exempt them from paying taxes on their land. There were tribes or Iwi as they are known who did not sign the treaty after traders and missionaries travelled around the country during the 1840s with copies as Maori did not think the treaty applied to them. The common belief is that there is one version of the treaty that is revised and not two parts used to settle grievances. There is not always clarity about which version of the treaty representatives would use in their rulings as the English version is usually looked at instead of the Maori version. Many of the land sales before the treaty was signed in 1840 were no longer valid and the treaty signing was partially in fear of other nations claiming land within New Zealand like the French. The Maori had the impression there would not be many more arrivals of foreigners until they began turning up.

During the 1960s there was a revival amongst the Maori to reclaim land as many were moving into urban areas. As Maori moved into towns and cities many thought the lands had begun to lose importance. This lead to revived pride in the land through the Maori land marches along with several other movements in the early 1970s to bring awareness to the government and pakeha of their grievances that related towards the treaty. Waitangi Day protests began in 1971 and the day to the Maori community is a day of protest. The Maori land march in 1975 was led by Whina Cooper who with 5,000 people marched to Wellington from the far north of the North Island to hand over a petition with 60,000 signatures. The word for march was actually a hikoi. At the time Whina had been 80 years of age when she marched across the country with her supporters. There were other protests during the 1970s including the Raglan Golf course which had been owned by Maori, but used as an airfield during World War II. The land had not reverted back to the traditional owners afterwards.

 Politicians no longer attend the events at Waitangi after they have been harassed by protesters opting for quiet events in Wellington. The Queen even has had clothing thrown at her during one Waitangi Day visit. Around the same time as the land marches the Treaty of Waitangi Act of 1975 was created and this in turn created the Waitangi Tribunal. The Act was used to look into the breaches of the treaty since the signing. It was not until around 1985that the tribunal began investigating the breaches and there were payouts awarded to various groups across the country. The government does not hide the fact there is unrest or misinformation about the signing of the Waitangi Treaty. They did help to produce a booklet about the different aspects of the treaty including the demonstrations in regards to The Maori.

Waitangi Day began as a national day on the 6th of February in the 1960s called New Zealand Day and then changed to the day everyone knows as Waitangi Day. On the same day in 1840 the treaty signed by Maori chiefs in Waitangi, which is also the name of the treaty. The day is not without its issues or tensions that have been bought to the surface. The day actually has different meanings to the different groups of people in the country. The Maori seen the day as one for protest about what they have lost through the treaty and many pakeha people feel the day is one of celebration being part of New Zealand. Not everyone is aware of the problems of the past in regards to the treaty or the national day. Politicians who have turned up to the events in Waitangi have been harassed by many of the protesters who turn up to protest. The government have tried to appease the problems in regards to the treaty by the creation of the Waitangi Tribunal in response to the Maori land marches around the same time and also the Waitangi Act of 1975. Waitangi Day maybe the national day for New Zealanders to celebrate, but when looking below the surface there are not always people who are happy about what have occurred in the past and in regards to the trouble, the government has responded by investigating the reasons behind the tension and trying to correct past mistakes. No matter what someone’s view towards the day it will be a national day that has problems that are no worse than other national days except that it revolves around the signing of a treaty.

Sources

Blumhardt, Hannah ‘Multi-textualism, 'treaty hegemony' and the Waitangi Tribunal: Making sense of 19th century Crown-Maori negotiations in Te Urewera’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 43, Jul 2012, pp. 263-287.

Keane, Basil ‘Waitangi Day incidents video’, The encyclopaedia of New Zealand, http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/video/35936/waitangi-day-incidents, accessed 3, accessed March 2015.

Keane, Basil ‘Story: Ngā rōpū tautohetohe – Māori protest movements’, The encyclopaedia of New Zealand, http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/nga-ropu-tautohetohe-maori-protest-movements/page-2, accessed 3 March 2015.

King, Michael The Penguin History of New Zealand, Auckland, Penguin books, 2003.

Kola, Jason ‘Re: Treaty of Waitangi twisted’, Gisborne Herald, 2015, http://www.gisborneherald.co.nz/opinion/columns/article/?id=40634, accessed 3 March 2015.

Mein Smith, Philippa  'Extracts: A concise history of New Zealand'  A concise history of New Zealand, Port Melbourne, Cambridge University Press, 2005. Extracts, pp. 47-53 and 227-237.

McLaughlan, Gordon A short history of New Zealand, Auckland, Penguin Books, 2014, pp. 61 – 62.

Reed, A.H. The Story of Northland, Auckland, A. H. & A. W. Reed, 1975.

Stokes, Evelyn ‘The Treaty of Waitangi and the Waitangi tribunal: Maori claims in New Zealand’, Applied Geography, 12, 1992, p. 177.

‘Treaty of Waitangi, Questions and Answers’, Network Waitangi Otautahi, 2012, http://nwo.org.nz/files/QandA.pdf, accessed 3 March 2015.

‘Treaty of Waitangi’, New Zealand, http://www.newzealand.com/au/feature/treaty-of-waitangi, accessed 17 March 2015.

‘Waitangi Day: The First Waitangi Day’, New Zealand History, http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/politics/treaty/waitangi-day/the-first-waitangi-day, accessed 17 March 2015.

‘Whina Cooper leads land march to Parliament’, http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/whina-cooper-led-land-march-te-ropu-o-te-matakite-reaches-parliament, accessed 26 January 2016

03 January 2016

Pulling the wool over multiple marriages, the life of William Frankpitt





Recently I was asked to do some research into a branch of family members that I had not done research on before and while shaking one of the branches, I came across some interesting information while doing an archive search that lead to a search through past newspapers in New Zealand. I ended up with some unexpected information that got my attention and that was the rest of the afternoon gone running down the basics to what I could find.


The search began when I searched for some information within the New Zealand National Archives website looking for William Henry Frankpitt. I wanted some clues to other family members and unexpectedly stumbled across two divorce records for William and a trial file from Greymouth that is available from the Christchurch archives. I was wondering about the three files so did the usual search on the Papers Past website and I came up with plenty of results on the life of William Henry Frankpitt. I will try to get these records in order.


I cannot find his birth for the time being, which is around 1871.  Henry is married in 1904 to Mary McArthur in New Zealand and a year later in 1905 they have a son Samuel Frankpitt. Around this time Henry is mentioned as being a shopkeeper in Kokataki on the South Island near Greymouth. Between 1908 and 1909 there are several civil court cases involving large sums of money from who I assume are companies (one being a biscuit company) from amounts ranging from 6 shillings to 27 pounds. It could be the beginnings of what would happen in years to come. In 1911, Mary passes away leaving Henry with their young son, Samuel. Henry does marry again once in 1913 and again in 1920, but this is plenty more to the story that I have found.


The biggest chunk of information was to occur in 1913. I will talk about the court case and leave the marriages until later as one of them does interconnect it seems with this court case. William appears within newspapers once again on the 8th of March, 1913 where he had been charged with an offence by having under false pretences 17 bales of wool with the value of around £196 from a local farmer, William Clayton. William represented himself to the farmer as being an agent for a wellington wool broker. It was mentioned he was a storekeeper residing a few miles away from Hokitika. On the 29th of March the prosecution needed a further week to work on the case and a bail application was made of £200 and two sureties of £120 each. It turns out within the news on the 9th of April 1913 Mr Frankpitt had represented himself as an agent for Murray, Roberts and co from Wellington and also told the farmer that he could obtain £2,000 in credit. By the 18th of June 1913, William had been sentenced to 9 months imprisonment.


Amazingly at the same time, William had remarried in 1913. He was a storekeeper in Auckland when he had a marriage ceremony. It was after the ceremony that William had learnt his wife, Nellie was a divorcee. According to the newspaper he had been acquainted with Nellie for several months. They travelled to Greymouth and he went away on business while he was there. The ‘business’ could have very well been in regards to the wool, but when he returned Nellie had vanished to Christchurch after selling all his furniture. He had gone to court to get an annulment for his wife’s desertion. He had been unable to find her in the city. The Judge in the court case to do with the bales of wool during sentencing concluded that both cases were actually separate when William had mentioned what had occurred with his wife. An interesting note before going further would be when William enlisted into the Army in 1915. He states he had not been sentenced to imprisonment by the civil powers even though he was discharged as being medically unfit.


William would marry Mary Braun in 1920, when Samuel would be around 15 years in age. In 1922 problems arise with the previous marriage. It turned out that the first marriage had not been nullified through the courts and was not until 1922 that this case would appear in the courts. According to the New Zealand Herald on the 31st of May, William had only found that his wife whom he thought was dead was actually alive and well in Wellington 12 months after he had remarried to Mary. The judge declared that the current marriage would be null and void would be made absolute within three months time. The matter went before the court again in regards to the second marriage not being binding and that William may have to pay maintenance or some form of alimony. It was pointed out that Mary was now working and William was now in hospital after an accident of some sort. William passed away in April in 1924 at the age of 53. It did not say if he died because of being crushed in an accident.


I found this case to be an interesting one as you never know what the twists and turns would be until you place the information together. All this came about on a whim through researching some records within New Zealand births deaths and marriages. I had only gotten the basics through official records, but further research uncovered more information. I will have to do some more research on William Henry Frankpitt especially order a certificate to confirm who his parents actually are. His birth certificate is actually missing, but other records say he was born in New Zealand on the West Coast on the South Island. There are several other people with the same name. I will get lucky and that is all what family history research is all about. Here I was thinking the added branch from the Downey family that married the Milverton’s in Palmerston North would not contain much at all.


Sources used

Family Search

Births, Deaths and Marriages, New Zealand


New Zealand National Archives

Papers Past

The following are through Papers Past the search terms were William Henry Frankpitt

Civil Court Cases, Evening Post, 7 February 1908

Grey River Argus , 8 April 1913

Supreme court sessions, West Coast Times , 17 June 1913

William Frankpitt, Civil cases, Evening Post, 9 April 1913

William Downey, A DEAL IN WOOL , Grey River Argus, 9 April 1913

William Frankpitt divorce, Auckland Star, 13 May 1921

Marriage Annulled, New Zealand Herald, 31 May 1922